Body Surface Area Calculator
Enter your height and weight in US or metric units to work out your BSA (body surface area) in both square metres and square feet. The guide explains the formula, compares the alternatives and shows where BSA is used in medicine.
Created by the Reeliy Editorial Team. Last updated: Oct 19, 2026
What is body surface area?
Body surface area (BSA) is the total area of the outside of the body, measured in square metres (m2). A typical adult has a BSA of roughly 1.6 to 2.0 m2, a newborn about 0.2 m2, and a very large adult can exceed 2.5 m2.
Nobody measures BSA directly in routine care, because wrapping and measuring a body is impractical. Instead it is estimated from two numbers that are easy to obtain, height and weight, using a formula fitted to measured data. Weight alone says little about size, and height alone says nothing about build, but together they track surface area well.
BSA matters because many physiological quantities scale with the surface of the body rather than with its mass: heat loss, fluid needs, organ blood flow and the way some drugs are cleared. Dividing by BSA lets clinicians compare a small patient and a large one on equal terms.
How to use this calculator
- Choose US units (feet, inches and pounds) or Metric units (centimetres or metres, and kilograms).
- Enter your height. In US mode you can fill in feet only, inches only, or both. In metric mode pick centimetres or metres with the selector.
- Enter your weight. The weight is read in pounds in US mode and in kilograms in metric mode, so make sure the unit system matches the number you typed.
- Press Calculate BSA. The result is shown in both square feet and square metres, with the unit of your chosen system first.
If height is left blank or is zero, the result is zero, because the formula multiplies by a power of the height. Weight is required.
BSA formulas
Dozens of formulas have been published since the late nineteenth century. They all have the same shape, a constant times weight raised to one power times height raised to another, and they differ in the constants and exponents fitted to their original samples. This calculator uses the best known one, published by Du Bois and Du Bois in 1916.
BSA (m²) = 0.007184 × W0.425 × H0.725Du Bois and Du Bois. W is weight in kilograms, H is height in centimetres.
The same equation can be written with height in metres, in which case the constant becomes 0.20247. Square feet follow from the exact relation 1 m2 = 10.7639 ft2.
Other widely used formulas
- Mosteller (1987): BSA = √(H × W ÷ 3600), with H in centimetres and W in kilograms. It is easy to evaluate by hand and gives results within a percent or two of Du Bois for most adults.
- Haycock (1978): BSA = 0.024265 × W0.5378 × H0.3964. It was validated on infants and children as well as adults, so paediatric teams often prefer it.
- Gehan and George (1970): BSA = 0.0235 × W0.51456 × H0.42246. It was fitted to a paediatric oncology sample and became a standard for children receiving chemotherapy.
- Boyd (1935): uses weight in grams and a logarithmic exponent, which makes it awkward to compute by hand; it was built to cover everyone from newborns to large adults.
The table shows how closely they agree. Each cell is the formula's estimate in m2, rounded to two decimals.
| Height and weight | Du Bois | Mosteller | Haycock | Gehan and George | Boyd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 cm, 16 kg | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| 150 cm, 45 kg | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.38 | 1.39 |
| 165 cm, 60 kg | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.67 | 1.67 |
| 175 cm, 75 kg | 1.90 | 1.91 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 1.92 |
| 185 cm, 95 kg | 2.19 | 2.21 | 2.22 | 2.22 | 2.22 |
For an average adult the formulas agree to within about 0.02 m2. The gap widens at the extremes, which is why a protocol should always name the formula it expects.
Worked example
Take a person who is 168 cm tall and weighs 62 kg. Raise the weight to the power 0.425 (620.425 ≈ 5.778) and the height to 0.725 (1680.725 ≈ 41.053), then multiply by the constant.
0.007184 × 5.778 × 41.053 ≈ 1.704 m²
Mosteller's formula gives √(168 × 62 ÷ 3600) = √2.893 ≈ 1.701 m2, a difference of 0.003 m2. In square feet the Du Bois result is 1.704 × 10.7639 ≈ 18.34 ft2.
For a US-units check, someone who is 5 ft 6 in and weighs 140 lb is 167.64 cm and 63.50 kg, which comes to about 1.7188 m2, or 18.50 ft2.
Typical BSA by height and weight
The grid lists Du Bois estimates in m2. It is a quick way to sanity-check a result: moving 10 kg heavier at the same height adds about 0.1 m2, and 10 cm taller at the same weight adds roughly 0.06 to 0.08 m2.
| Height | 50 kg | 60 kg | 70 kg | 80 kg | 90 kg | 100 kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 cm | 1.43 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 1.75 | 1.84 | 1.92 |
| 160 cm | 1.50 | 1.62 | 1.73 | 1.83 | 1.93 | 2.02 |
| 170 cm | 1.57 | 1.69 | 1.81 | 1.92 | 2.01 | 2.11 |
| 180 cm | 1.63 | 1.77 | 1.89 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.20 |
| 190 cm | 1.70 | 1.84 | 1.96 | 2.08 | 2.18 | 2.28 |
Children are much smaller on this scale. A 1-year-old is typically a little over 0.4 m2, and adult-range values of 1.5 to 1.7 m2 are reached during the teenage years.
Where BSA is used
- Drug dosing. Many chemotherapy agents are prescribed in milligrams per square metre. A 1.7 m2 patient prescribed 100 mg/m2 receives 170 mg.
- Cardiac index. Cardiac output (litres per minute) divided by BSA gives the cardiac index, which allows comparison between patients of different size. An output of 5.4 L/min in a person with a BSA of 1.8 m2 is an index of 3.0 L/min/m2.
- Kidney function. Glomerular filtration rate is conventionally reported per 1.73 m2. A measured GFR of 90 mL/min in someone whose BSA is 1.9 m2 corresponds to 90 × 1.73 ÷ 1.9 ≈ 82 mL/min/1.73 m2.
- Burns and skin conditions. The share of the body surface affected guides fluid replacement and treatment. Tools such as the rule of nines work in percentages of total BSA.
- Energy and heat. Basal heat production correlates with surface area, which is one reason size features in BMR, RMR and TDEE estimates.
This calculator gives an estimate for general information and education. Clinical dosing must follow a prescriber's protocol, which may specify a particular formula, a capped BSA or a different weight measure. It is not medical advice; see the disclaimer.
Limitations
Every BSA formula is a statistical fit, not a measurement. Accuracy is lowest at the extremes of body size, in people with a large amount of oedema or very high or very low body fat, and in infants. Two formulas can disagree by several percent for the same patient.
Height and weight must be current. Using a self-reported height or an old weight is the most common source of error, and mixing up pounds and kilograms changes the answer by a factor of about 2.20.425, or roughly 40 percent. For a broader picture of body size see the BMI calculator and the ideal weight calculator.
Frequently asked questions
Which BSA formula does this calculator use?
It uses the Du Bois and Du Bois formula, BSA = 0.007184 × weight^0.425 × height^0.725, with weight in kilograms and height in centimetres. It is the most widely cited formula and the one many reference tables are built on.
What is a normal body surface area?
Adults typically fall between about 1.6 and 2.0 square metres, with women on average slightly lower than men. Children have much smaller values, and the figure grows with height and weight.
Why is BSA used instead of body weight to dose some drugs?
Metabolic rate, blood volume and organ function scale more closely with surface area than with weight, so dosing per square metre reduces variation between patients of different sizes. This is common for chemotherapy. Some drugs are better dosed by weight, so follow the protocol for the specific medicine.
Is Mosteller or Du Bois more accurate?
For most adults they agree within a percent or two, so neither is clearly better. Mosteller is simpler to compute by hand. For children, formulas such as Haycock are often preferred. What matters most is using the same formula the protocol specifies.
Can BSA be used to estimate body fat or health risk?
No. BSA only describes size. Two people with the same BSA can have very different amounts of muscle and fat, so use measures such as BMI or body fat percentage for that.
References
- Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1916;17:863-871.
- Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987;317:1098.
- Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. Journal of Pediatrics, 1978;93:62-66.
- Gehan EA, George SL. Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 1970;54:225-235.
- Boyd E. The Growth of the Surface Area of the Human Body. University of Minnesota Press, 1935.
Cite this calculator and page
If you use this page in your work, you can cite it as:
Reeliy Editorial Team. (2026). Body Surface Area Calculator. Reeliy. https://reeliy.com/calculators/bsa-calculator“Body Surface Area Calculator.” Reeliy, 2026, https://reeliy.com/calculators/bsa-calculator.